Skip to main content
Human disturbance and the magnitude and predictability of phenotypic divergence

Human disturbance and the magnitude and predictability of phenotypic divergence

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Supplementary Files

Authors

Santiago Ortega , Eduardo S. A. Santos , Kiyoko Gotanda, Sarah Sanderson, Lucas Damian Gorne, Andrew Hendry, Shinichi Nakagawa 

Abstract

Environmental change can drive phenotypic change within species, but it remains unclear whether such responses produce a general and predictable degree of phenotypic divergence across populations. We conducted a preregistered reanalysis of PROCEED v6.2, comprising 7,186 contrasts from 254 references and 253 species, to test whether the magnitude and predictability of phenotypic divergence differ among disturbance contexts and across temporal, biological, and methodological characteristics of studies. We used ln M to quantify phenotypic differences between paired population samples relative to the variation retained within them and fitted phylogenetic location--scale meta-regressions to model average divergence and residual heterogeneity jointly. Across the dataset, average phenotypic divergence was substantial but did not consistently exceed within-population variation, while total heterogeneity reached 96.6%, providing little support for a universal magnitude of divergence. Disturbance contexts differed more strongly in predictability than in average divergence. Landscape change and introduced populations showed greater divergence than in situ natural variation, while landscape change was also comparatively predictable. By contrast, responses to introduced species consistently showed greater variation among contrasts than most other contexts, whereas the lower predictability of hunting or harvesting and in situ natural variation depended partly on a single large Pacific salmon dataset. Moderator associations should be interpreted cautiously because study characteristics were unevenly represented and partly confounded, and some results were sensitive to robustness analyses. Overall, environmental change can produce substantial phenotypic divergence, but neither its magnitude nor its predictability is uniform across systems. Accounting for heterogeneity therefore reveals when broad comparative responses are likely to generalize and when population-specific evidence is required.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.32942/X2TT3G

Subjects

Life Sciences

Keywords

contemporary evolution, human disturbance, intraspecific variation, phenotypic heterogeneity, location--scale meta-analysis, global change

Dates

Published: 2026-10-07 17:03

Last Updated: 2026-10-07 17:03

License

CC BY Attribution 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Data and Code Availability Statement:
https://github.com/Santiago-0rtega/Magnitude_pace_modern_life

Language:
English

Metrics

Views: 33

Downloads: 3