Skip to main content
Multivariate social strategies buffer the fitness consequences of phenotype–environment mismatches

Multivariate social strategies buffer the fitness consequences of phenotype–environment mismatches

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

Corné de Groot , Rori Efrain Wijnhorst , Yimen G Araya-Ajoy, Alastair J. Wilson, Henrik Jensen, Jonathan Wright, Niels J. Dingemanse

Abstract

How organisms adapt to environmental change is a fundamental question in biology. Environmental shifts frequently induce mismatches between an organism's phenotype and its surroundings, including the social environments created by interacting individuals. Such mismatches can be mitigated by modifying one's own phenotype through plasticity, adjusting the environment, or selecting environments matching intrinsic phenotypes. Using a wild passerine bird model, we investigated social foraging under negative frequency-dependent selection, where fitness is determined by the proportion of individuals searching for food (“producing”) versus exploiting others (“scrounging”). Because individuals possess distinct and repeatable behavioral types, they experience unique phenotype–environment mismatches relative to this landscape. By experimentally manipulating group compositions, we estimated how house sparrows integrate plasticity and environmental modification to mitigate these mismatches. We show that individuals adjusted their own foraging tactics while simultaneously eliciting behavioral changes in partners. These responses varied among individuals and are integrated with behavioral types, but their combined effect on phenotypic expression did not shift the population toward the fitness peak, which was already closely approximated by the population mean. Instead, this multivariate strategy attenuated the fitness consequences of phenotype–environment mismatches by redistributing fitness among individuals: those furthest from the peak gain fitness, whereas those closest to it lose fitness. Consequently, social responsiveness and social impact reduced among-individual variation in fitness by 47%, weakening the selective differences that would otherwise drive evolutionary change. Broadly, our findings reveal how coordinated responses to social environments can stabilize individual fitness outcomes while constraining the evolutionary consequences of behavioral variation.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.32942/X2N09X

Subjects

Ecology and Evolutionary Biology

Keywords

Phenotypic integration, Selection, Phenotypic plasticity, Social evolution, Foraging

Dates

Published: 2026-08-28 07:58

Last Updated: 2026-08-28 07:58

License

CC BY Attribution 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Conflict of interest statement:
None

Data and Code Availability Statement:
https://github.com/C-dG/PS_Psi_Phi_W

Language:
English

Metrics

Views: 19

Downloads: 2