Skip to main content
Sleep elasticity: accessory, useful and vital components of a single state

Sleep elasticity: accessory, useful and vital components of a single state

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Supplementary Files

Authors

Giorgio F. Gilestro 

Abstract

Sleep is universal, homeostatically defended and apparently costly, and for half a century this combination has been read as evidence of a vital, conserved function still awaiting identification. The search has not converged. Instead, it has accumulated a dozen candidate functions, each defensible but none commanding assent. I argue that the difficulty lies with the question rather than with the answers to it. Evolution optimises fitness, not function, and asking what fitness sleep confers, and to whom, removes the expectation of a single answer. Reviewing the comparative, experimental and epidemiological evidence, I propose the sleep elasticity hypothesis: that sleep is not one thing but up to three components of separate evolutionary origin, superimposed into a single state. An accessory component arose first as an ecological buffer, keeping an animal safely and economically inactive during the hours in which activity would not repay itself; it discharges no dedicated cellular transaction, yet carries most of the sevenfold interspecific variation in sleep duration, the elasticity that gives the hypothesis its name. A useful component comprises the lineage-specific processes subsequently exapted onto that pre-existing state, so that what a species does with its sleep becomes a fact about the species rather than about sleep. A vital component, if it exists, is a small and still unidentified residue, which I hold open as a hypothesis rather than deny. The three observations conventionally taken to establish indispensability, that deprivation kills, that sleep is costly, and that no sleepless animal exists, do not carry the weight placed on them, and the literature on the harms of sleep loss, in animals and humans alike, is confounded throughout by stress. Sleep elasticity instead accommodates what single-function accounts must explain away: the migrating bird that sheds sleep for weeks and never repays it, the cavefish that has lost most of its sleep but kept the homeostat that would defend it, the fur seal that abandons one sleep state at sea while defending the other, and the captive sloth that sleeps six hours longer than its free-living counterpart. What makes inactivity sustainable is the elevated arousal threshold, and depth measured that way, rather than the slow wave, offers the most promising route to separating the three components experimentally.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.32942/X22D71

Subjects

Biology, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Evolution, Neuroscience and Neurobiology, Systems Biology

Keywords

sleep function; adaptive inactivity; exaptation; arousal threshold; sleep homeostasis; comparative biology of sleep; sleep deprivation; fitness

Dates

Published: 2026-08-19 17:40

Last Updated: 2026-08-19 17:40

License

CC BY Attribution 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Data and Code Availability Statement:
All primary behavioural data come from our own previously published Drosophila recordings (Joyce et al., 2024). The derived data and the Python script that generates Figure 2 are supplied as supplementary files, described in the accompanying README. The analysis in Figure 2 is original to this article: the hidden Markov segmentation of the recordings, the survival analysis of 516,543 decoded bouts and the metastability model fitted to them are reported here for the first time.

Language:
English

Metrics

Views: 41

Downloads: 0