Skip to main content
Integrating primary and meta-analytic effect size estimates on the effects of PFAS and organochlorine pesticides on human health outcomes

Integrating primary and meta-analytic effect size estimates on the effects of PFAS and organochlorine pesticides on human health outcomes

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

Kyle Morrison , Lorenzo Ricolfi, Iwo Gross , Ayumi Mizuno, Pietro Pollo, Marija Purgar, Malgorzata Lagisz, Shinichi Nakagawa

Abstract

Persistent organic pollutants such as per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and
organochlorine pesticides are among the most extensively studied environmental
contaminants, yet the evidence base remains fragmented across primary studies and
meta-analyses, limiting its ability to chart new research directions. To address this
fragmentation, we developed a unified database that links primary epidemiological
estimates with meta-analytic summaries of associations between PFAS and
organochlorine pesticide exposures and human health outcomes. The database was
constructed following a systematic five-step process encompassing (1) literature
search, (2) literature screening, (3) data extraction, (4) data curation, and (5)
visualisation. The final database includes 627 unique primary studies (n) providing
3,627 individual primary study estimates (k) that were synthesised in 91 meta-analyses
comprising 457 pooled effect size estimates. The most frequently investigated
chemicals were PFOA (CAS: 335-67-1, n = 268, k = 736) and PFOS (CAS: 1763-23-1, n =
276, k = 682) among PFAS, and DDE (CAS: 72-55-9, n = 95 k = 150) and p,p’-DDE (CAS:
72-55-9, n = 90, k = 136) among organochlorine pesticides. Metabolic disorders (ICD11:
5C8Z, n = 39, k = 333) and neoplasms of breast (ICD11: 2C6Z, n = 78, k = 309) were the
most assessed health outcomes. Primary studies were most often led by authors based
in the United States, whereas meta-analyses were predominantly conducted by
researchers in China. Based on the structure of this database, we outline practical
methodological recommendations to improve future conduct and reporting practices,
and we discuss potential applications of this database to support future research in
environmental health.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.32942/X2DT2C

Subjects

Medicine and Health Sciences

Keywords

contamination, pollution, research synthesis, evidence syntheses, heterogeneity

Dates

Published: 2026-08-11 14:39

Last Updated: 2026-08-11 14:39

License

CC BY Attribution 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Data and Code Availability Statement:
We provide the database in full, including the associated metadata and code, in the following archived repository (cite once archived) and GitHub repository (https://github.com/KyleMorrison99/pop_health_database). We also provide an accessible GitHub data page which can be used to freely download the data https://kylemorrison99.github.io/pop_health_database/.

Language:
English

Metrics

Views: 37

Downloads: 3