Skip to main content
Biodiversity Externality Costs Through Supply Chain: A pass-Through Input-Output Framework for Biodiversity Financial Impact Assessment

Biodiversity Externality Costs Through Supply Chain: A pass-Through Input-Output Framework for Biodiversity Financial Impact Assessment

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

Daniel Ramos garcía, Lisa Mayer

Abstract

Transition biodiversity risk is increasingly recognised as a source of financial risk, yet no framework exists to translate firm-level biodiversity impacts into credit risk metrics comparable to those developed for climate transition risk or even biodiversity dependency risk. This paper fills that gap by adapting the cost pass-through input-output methodology, established in the climate transition risk literature to biodiversity. We construct country- and sector-level biodiversity impact intensities across six pressure categories using Exiobase 3 and LC-IMPACT characterisation factors, monetise them using willingness-to-pay externality costs, and propagate the resulting cost shock through the supply chain via sector specific pass-through rates. The propagated cost is mapped to firm-level probability of default through a Merton structural model, applied to the STOXX Europe 600. Results show that indirect supply-chain exposure dominates direct exposure by more than two to one and that land use and water consumption are the primary financial risk drivers. Weighted-average probability of default rises from 0.17% to 2.05% under the central scenario. Impacts are concentrated across a small number of firms and impact channels, with land use and climate change accounting for most of the impact. Externality cost estimates and pass-through calibration are the dominant sources of methodological uncertainty, each requiring explicit assumptions that are difficult to standardise across scenarios. In aggregate, biodiversity scenario design involves a fundamental trade-off between flexibility and supervisory comparability, one that pre-competitive collaboration can help address.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.32942/X2B696

Subjects

Environmental Indicators and Impact Assessment, Environmental Monitoring, Environmental Studies, Other Economics

Keywords

Biodiversity transition risk, Cost pass-through, Input-output analysis, Credit risk

Dates

Published: 2026-07-30 22:55

Last Updated: 2026-07-30 22:55

License

CC BY Attribution 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Conflict of interest statement:
None

Data and Code Availability Statement:
EXIOBASE version 3.10.2 can be downloaded from https://zenodo.org/records/20051562, LCIMPACT version 1.3 can be downloaded from https://lc-impact.eu/. Financial data has been retrieved from S&P IQ Capital, which requires a license. Distance-to-default can be obtained from CRI database, available at: http://nuscri.org.

Language:
English

Metrics

Views: 13

Downloads: 1