This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.
Evaluating the potential of molecular dietary analysis of predators for the detection of emerging plant pests
Downloads
Authors
Abstract
Monitoring plant pests is crucial for maximising yields across agricultural and forest production systems, but also for the mitigation of invasive species spread. Traditional monitoring methods, such as mass trapping and direct observation, scale poorly and introduce latency between collection, detection and response. Since many plant pests are frequently consumed by predators, molecular dietary analyses like dietary DNA metabarcoding could provide effective, scalable and passive monitoring of emerging and established pests.
To understand the efficacy of molecular dietary analysis for pest monitoring, how it can be implemented and the likely obstacles to its success, we conducted a systematic review of the literature to extract information from studies focused on the detection of pests using molecular dietary analysis of predators. Of an initial 667 potential studies, data were extracted from 45. Across eight broad predator groups, these studies demonstrate the efficacy of dietary DNA metabarcoding for detecting a range of potential pest groups, alongside the methodological variation in current applications. Insectivorous bats, passerine and near-passerine birds and web-building spiders were the focal predators of most studies, with critical gaps across broader taxonomic groups. We exemplify the application of dietary metabarcoding to detecting pests in these three predator groups through case studies. Dietary metabarcoding of predators presents a viable and efficacious monitoring tool for plant pests and could become an integral component of the wider biomonitoring toolbox. For a fully robust monitoring approach using this method, we must, however, streamline implementation, circumvent methodological pitfalls and expedite the generation of usable monitoring datasets.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32942/X2FT2P
Subjects
Agriculture, Behavior and Ethology, Biodiversity, Biosecurity, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Entomology, Forest Biology, Forest Management, Forest Sciences, Genetics, Laboratory and Basic Science Research Life Sciences, Life Sciences, Research Methods in Life Sciences
Keywords
biomonitoring, ecological interactions, metabarcoding, molecular diagnostics, network ecology, trophic interactions, ecological interactions, metabarcoding, molecular diagnostics, network ecology, trophic interactions
Dates
Published: 2026-06-01 16:28
Last Updated: 2026-06-01 16:28
License
CC BY Attribution 4.0 International
Additional Metadata
Conflict of interest statement:
None
Data and Code Availability Statement:
All data are openly available via Zenodo: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20432027
Language:
English
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.